The world is shocked by the killing of 24-year-old reporter Alison Parker and 27-year-old cameraman Adam Ward, of small Virginia station WDBJ (a CBS affiliate), by disgruntled and disturbed ex-co-worker Vester Lee Flanagan II, who is a homosexual and a former prostitute.

The Daily Telegraph has learned that “police reportedly confiscated a gay pride flag” from the apartment of Vester Lee Flanagan (Bryce Williams) Wednesday. In an apparent hate crime, Flanagan is the 41 year-old black journalist who executed two white Virginia reporters on live television Wednesday morning before turning his gun on himself.

Vester Flanagan aka "Bryce Williams" - Ban LGBT Rainbow

In a manifesto faxed to ABC News, Flanagan, an Obama-supporter, claimed that his motive involved a “race war.” Flanagan was black and gay and apparently angered by the fact that he had been a victim of racism and homophobia at the hands of “black men and white women.”

The trio of Flanagan’s intended victims were heterosexual.

The gay pride rainbow flag reportedly found in Flanagan’s apartment is seen by many as a symbol of anti-Christian hate.

After a white racist terrorist, Dylann Roof, in South Carolina murdered nine innocent black churchgoers, photos of the shooter with the Confederate Flag resulted in a media frenzy to ban the flag and remove all Confederate historical symbols.

If the Confederate battle flag is a symbol of racism, the rainbow flag is a symbol of anti-Christian bigotry.

Like the Confederate flag, the provocative gay pride flag, a symbol of religious oppression, has flown on government property.

The Confederate Flag has since been taken down in South Carolina.

Thus far the media has not reported on the fact that Flanagan owned the LGBT rainbow hate-flag.

Sunday in Reno, Nevada, the infamous gay-pride rainbow flag replaced the American flag over City Hall. The outrage was immediate. For very good reason, many see the gay pride flag as a symbol of oppression, hate and bullying. City leaders eventually backed down claiming that the fascist gay-pride flag was supposed to fly with the American flag, not replace the American flag.

Both men wanted a race war. Both men committed murder in an attempt to spark it. But both men’s stories are treated very differently by the media.

But despite these striking similarities, the type of guilt by association drawn by the media is very different in each case:

Police reportedly confiscated a gay pride flag from Flanagan’s apartment on Wednesday, but in an example of hypocrisy, this hasn’t sparked outrage from liberals who wanted to ban the Confederate flag due to its association with Charleston, S.C. church shooter Dylann Roof.

“Libs got the Confederate flag taken down in South Carolina,” blogger Dave Blount pointed out. “They have imposed a de facto ban throughout the country through their control of major retailers like Walmart, Amazon, eBay, Sears, etc.”

“The show The Dukes of Hazard has been taken off the air because it features the flag on the roof of a car.”

Another gay extremist, Floyd Lee Corkins, who researched the SPLC “Hate Map” for anti-gay groups, targeted the pro-family Family Research Council before shooting the security guard in a planned massacre that was thwarted by a security guard.

Political Power for European Americans!

European people should organize and advance their own interests just like every other group. Join our fight for Heritage and Identity!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to [email protected] or click here:


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support American Freedom Party growth and our heritage of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party! Political Power for European-Americans!


European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!




American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party

The post Time to Ban LGBT Rainbow Hate-Flag appeared first on American Freedom Party.

2

Sep

by Be Active Front USA



#BeActiveFrontUSA

2

Sep

by Be Active Front USA



#BeActiveFrontUSA

Kommando Freisler - "Project Wolfsschanze (Club Dirlewanger)" Compact Disc Kommando Freisler - Project Wolfsschanze (Live Im Club Dirlewanger) contains 21 German National Socialist songs recorded live at Club Dirlewanger and comes in a nice DVD case design: Finde Deinen Weg Nordland Das Lied des Helden Mitten In Europa Wer Deutschland Nicht Liebt Es Tut Weh Rebell Texas Nordland JJ Die Rote Pest Trotz Alledem! Septembertag Es War Das Vaterland Rechtsextrem Just Short Of Glory Kriegsverbrechen Tomorrow Belongs To Me Reichsfoloniallied Peter Unsere Fahne Deutschland Wach Auf! Download: Project Wolfsschanze - "Mitten In Europa" Full Song Mp3 Download (2.7 mb)

Former prime minister Péter Boross claimed that mass immigration into Hungary presents a challenge because of “race and ethnicity” rather than culture, Index.hu writes.

In an interview for pro-government daily Magyar Hírlap, Boross, who was prime minister for seven months in 1993-94 after the death of József Antall, said that “Although no one has dared to say it so far, immigration is an issue of race and ethnicity, not of culture and civilization. It is so because millions of people speaking different languages and having different skin color from that of Europeans are entering Europe. They do not only have a different culture, but more importantly a different system of instincts accompanied by different biological and genetic capabilities.”

Peter BorossBoross expressed his agreement with the building of the border fence and insisted that “Viktor Orbán is doing everything in his power, but the government’s hands are often tied by EU law.” He also condemned the “opposition” media for showing the “human face” of refugees, while “humanistic considerations are of secondary importance to the fate of our nation in resolving this crisis.”

Not one European derived country is granting asylum to the South African Boer farmers, who are experiencing ethnic genocide daily, as refugees.

Bob Whitaker 2016

“Diverse” means formerly White… –Bob Whitaker

Political Power for European Americans!

European people should organize and advance their own interests just like every other group. Join our fight for Heritage and Identity!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to [email protected] or click here:


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support American Freedom Party growth and our heritage of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party! Political Power for European-Americans!


European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!




American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party

The post Former Prime Minister of Hungary: Immigration is “Issue of Race and Ethnicity” appeared first on American Freedom Party.

By Brian Anderson | They don’t even have a right to be in this country, but a US Court of Appeals has ruled the illegal aliens have gun ownership rights. I’m not really sure how that works and as you will soon see neither do the federal judges on the panel that made the ruling.

Bandits

First, a little background: There is a federal law that bans illegal aliens from owning or possessing firearms and ammunition. Mariano Meza-Rodriguez is an illegal alien who was arrested for assault in 2012. He was found to be in possession of a single .22 caliber round, which violated federal law. He was convicted and deported to Mexico. As a convicted felon, he is banned from ever entering the US again. He challenged the conviction saying it violated his 2nd Amendment rights to keep and bear arms.

Now here’s the preposterous decision courtesy of JSonline:

In the case of a Milwaukee man deported over a single .22-caliber cartridge, a federal appeals court ruled last week that even unlawful immigrants can be part of “the public” that enjoys a Second Amendment right to keep a gun for self-defense.

Unlawful immigrant? Sweet euphemism, bro.

The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said even undocumented immigrants can be part of “the people” protected by the Bill of Rights, though it upheld the man’s conviction on a specific law that prohibits most such people from having guns.

“It is now clear that the Second Amendment right to bear arms is no second-class entitlement, (and) we see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that the unauthorized (or maybe all noncitizens) are excluded,” Judge Diane Wood wrote for a panel that included Judges Frank Easterbrook and Joel Flaum.

“No language in the Amendment supports such a conclusion, nor, as we have said, does a broader consideration of the Bill of Rights.”

Well, actually the 2nd Amendment is a right reserved for US Citizens. Here’s the exact wording:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The militia is the sum total of the people (citizens) of the free state (America). A right belonging to “the people” is reserved for US citizens. Our Founding Fathers didn’t create a document to assert worldwide human rights; they wrote the Constitution to preserve the rights of the citizens of the country they fought so hard to establish.

I know liberals have a lot of trouble understanding the 2nd Amendment, but it is painfully obvious that this right (among other things) is for US citizens to be armed in the protection of the US.

The screwy thing here is, the Court of Appeals upheld Meza-Rodriguez’s conviction and also ruled that illegal aliens are like the mentally ill, domestic abusers, and convicted felons in that they can be banned from owning firearms. So basically, illegal aliens have a 2nd Amendment right to gun ownership except that they don’t because they are banned from gun ownership due to their legal status. Makes perfect sense to me. Not!

I kind of feel like this confusing ruling is from some activist judges that want to open up all American civil rights to illegal aliens. You know, like voting rights and such? They don’t really want to put guns in the hands of illegal aliens because they hate gun ownership, but they do want to lay the groundwork for getting them in the voting booth to cast ballots for democrats.

Bob Whitaker 2016

“Put Americans first..” –American Freedom Party

Political Power for European Americans!

European people should organize and advance their own interests just like every other group. Join our fight for Heritage and Identity!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to [email protected] or click here:


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support American Freedom Party growth and our heritage of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party! Political Power for European-Americans!


European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!




American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party

The post Federal Court Rules Illegal Aliens Have 2nd Amendment Gun Ownership Rights appeared first on American Freedom Party.

Because they don’t want them as permanent residents.

Foreign workers are fine so long as they’re productively working, improving the economic of the country, and will go home when their contracts are up.

Foreign residents, however, tend to bring their own cultural and political baggage with them. These countries are already struggling to deal with modernization and political/social reform, so they don’t need anybody else’s crap piled on top.

the Idiot West is only too happy to help.

“There are currently 17 countries participating in the Syria resettlement/ Humanitarian Admission Programme efforts. The countries that have made specific pledges are Australia, Austria, Canada, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. In addition, France and the USA are participating, but have not yet provided specific numbers.”

Refugee Chart

Even foreign workers can be a pain, as was shown during the 1991 Gulf War. Palestinian and Yemini workers were expelled from several of these states because their home governments came out in support of Iraq, contrary to the politics of their host governments’ policies.

With foreign workers, you can just cancel their visas and send them home. If you’ve accepted people as immigrants, you can’t chuck them out when they prove to be a headache.

SYRIAN MUSLIMS sue Japan for not taking them in as refugees

Why aren’t they suing Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and all the other filthy-rich Arab Gulf states that aren’t taking in their fellow Muslims as refugees either?

Japan has been severely criticized for not taking in asylum seekers, especially Muslim asylum seekers, even though they nearly doubled the number of refugees they accepted last year – 11. How many have Saudi Arabia and Kuwait taken in, despite their huge oil wealth – practically none.

While Japan spends a fortune on foreign aid to Muslim states, it doesn’t take in Muslim refugees, and for good reason.

Out of 5,000 applications. Japan has yet to grant asylum to a single Syrian, presumably because it isn’t looking for welfare scrounger who kill and rape in their spare time. But the Syrians aren’t taking it lying down.

AROUND 9 million people have fled their homes in Syria. Over 3 million have taken refuge in neighbouring countries. But thousands more have fanned out across the world, some to as far away as Japan. There, they have found the drawbridge up. The world’s third-largest economy has yet to grant asylum to a single Syrian.

Bob Whitaker 2016

“Put Americans first..” –American Freedom Party

The post Why Don’t Rich Arab Countries Accept Muslim Refugees? appeared first on American Freedom Party.

By Kevin MacDonald | I certainly counted myself among the skeptics when it comes to Donald Trump’s candidacy. But it’s clear now that he is going full populist on the issues that matter, first with his statements on trade deals, but now—and more importantly—on immigration. Ann Coulter calls his immigration statement “the greatest political document since the Magna Carta,”

I agree—if it can actually end up influencing policy. While other candidates like Scott Walker and Rick Santorum have mumbled things about legal immigration, the immigration issue will now define Trump’s candidacy. White Americans can finally express themselves on what kind of country they want to live in. As Coulter also points out, immigration is the only important issue:

Suddenly the cozy consensus among elites on immigration is exposed. White American voters started this election cycle with the deadening belief that it was going to be Hillary vs. Jeb in the election, with nary a mention that immigration was even an issue. Flip a coin, because it makes no difference to the big money or anyone else—the politics of oligarchy in action. Here’s a cartoon of a person who had hanged himself, his feet dangling down in front of a TV screen showing a presidential debate between Jeb and Hillary.

Exactly. And in that debate there would be zero questions on immigration—just the way the big media wants it.

But now Trump is saying what White Americans have been actually thinking for a very long time. This passage gets at the heart of the issue.

Put American Workers First! Decades of disastrous trade deals and immigration policies have destroyed our middle class. Today, nearly 40% of black teenagers are unemployed. Nearly 30% of Hispanic teenagers are unemployed. For black Americans without high school diplomas, the bottom has fallen out: more than 70% were employed in 1960, compared to less than 40% in 2000. Across the economy, the percentage of adults in the labor force has collapsed to a level not experienced in generations. As CBS news wrote in a piece entitled “America’s incredible shrinking middle class”: “If the middle-class is the economic backbone of America, then the country is developing osteoporosis.”

The influx of foreign workers holds down salaries, keeps unemployment high, and makes it difficult for poor and working class Americans – including immigrants themselves and their children – to earn a middle class wage. Nearly half of all immigrants and their US-born children currently live in or near poverty, including more than 60 percent of Hispanic immigrants. Every year, we voluntarily admit another 2 million new immigrants, guest workers, refugees, and dependents, growing our existing all-time historic record population of 42 million immigrants. We need to control the admission of new low-earning workers in order to: help wages grow, get teenagers back to work, aid minorities’ rise into the middle class, help schools and communities falling behind, and to ensure our immigrant members of the national family become part of the American dream.

The populist labor-market critique of immigration policy, pioneered by Senator Jeff Sessions and based on sound academic research, is finally getting into the political mainstream. The incredible reality is that putting American workers first is anathema to elites among both Democrats and Republicans. We talk a lot about implicit Whiteness here, and it has often been said that implicit Whiteness is not enough. But certainly the start of the revolution to restore a White America need not be explicitly White at all. The labor-market argument applies to the vast majority of Americans, Black and White alike. The idea that importing millions of uneducated, impoverished Third Worlders into the US — or any other European-derived country — would actually benefit the country is ridiculous.

It’s never been about the needs of most Americans, but rather the desires of businesses for cheap labor, the desires of the ethnic lobbies to get more of their people here to increase their power, and the desires of predominantly Jewish elites against the idea of a homogeneous White America. If there has been one constant threat of Jewish intellectual and political activity since World War II, it has been to oppose populism. Obviously, they much prefer an oligarchy of the wealthy with control of the media and in control of the donor class of both Republicans and Democrats.

And oligarchy is what they have gotten: The idea that Western societies are democracies is an illusion. In fact, an oligarchic model fits U.S. politics much better than a democratic model (see Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page in Perspectives on Politics, Sept. 2014, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens“).The Trump candidacy is the most hopeful sign that the present oligarchy could be circumvented at the presidential level.

What the establishment fears most is a highly visible, personally attractive, honest, populist candidate who cannot be shut out of the media and with enough money to run a viable campaign.

This Washington Examiner article is right on the money in showing that Trump’s statement actually fits well with the views of most Americans.

Donald Trump set off yet another wave of anguish and frustration among Republican political elites Sunday with more provocative statements about immigration, along with the release of a Trump immigration plan influenced by the Senate’s leading immigration hawk. But there are indications Trump’s positions on immigration are more in line with the views of the public — not just GOP voters, but the public at large — than those of his critics. “Donald Trump: Undocumented Immigrants ‘Have to Go,’” read the headline at NBC News, where Trump appeared on “Meet the Press.” “They have to go,” Trump told moderator Chuck Todd, referring to immigrants in the U.S. illegally. “We either have a country or we don’t have a country.”

At the same time, Trump unveiled a brief immigration position paper, created in consultation with Republican senator Jeff Sessions, calling for, among other things, an end to the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of birthright citizenship. Some of Trump’s presidential rivals, and no doubt many in the GOP establishment, were appalled. “Our leading Republican is embracing self-deportation, that all of the 11 million have to walk back where they came from, and maybe we’ll let some of them come back,” Sen. Lindsey Graham said on CBS. “I just hope we don’t go down that road as a party. So our leading contender, Mr. Trump, is going backward on immigration. And I think he’s going to take all of us with him if we don’t watch it.”

Let’s watch Graham run on that and see where it gets him (he is at zero percent in the latest poll). All his sucking up to the Israel Lobby has gotten him nowhere.

The real importance of the Examiner article is in highlighting a study showing just how out of touch elites are on immigration:

But are Trump’s views on immigration as far out of the mainstream as Graham suggests? Are they out of the mainstream at all? A recent academic paper, by Stanford professor David Broockman and Berkeley Ph.D candidate Douglas Ahler, suggests a majority of the public’s views on immigration are closer to Trump’s than to the advocates of comprehensive immigration reform.

The Broockman/Ahler paper, published in July, is about more than just immigration; it examines the range of public opinion on several issues. On each, the authors gave a scientifically-selected group of respondents a broad range of policy options. On immigration, they listed seven possibilities, ranging from open borders to shutting down all immigration. These are the options Broockman and Ahler presented to respondents:

  1. The United States should have open borders and allow further immigration on an unlimited basis.
  2. Legal immigration to the United States should greatly increase among all immigrant groups, regardless of their skills. Immigrants already in the United States should be put on the path to citizenship.
  3. Immigration of highly skilled individuals should greatly increase. Immigration by those without such skills should continue at its current pace, although this immigration should be legalized.
  4. Immigration of highly skilled individuals should greatly increase, and immigration among those without such skills should be limited in time and/or magnitude, e.g., through a guest worker program.
  5. The United States should admit more highly skilled immigrants and secure the border with increased physical barriers to stem the flow of other immigrants.
  6. Only a small number of highly skilled immigrants should be allowed into the United States until the border is fully secured, and all illegal immigrants currently in the U.S. should be deported.
  7. Further immigration to the United States should be banned until the border is fully secured, and all illegal immigrants currently in the U.S. should be deported immediately.

Here are the results Broockman and Ahler got: 4.7 percent supported Option One; 17.4 percent supported Option Two; 10.8 percent supported Option Three; 12.0 percent supported Option Four; 17.0 percent supported Option Five; 13.8 percent supported Option Six; and 24.4 percent supported Option Seven. The largest single group, 24.4 percent, supported the most draconian option — closed borders and mass deportation — that is dismissed by every candidate in the race, including Trump.

Add in the next group that supported Option Six, which would allow only a “small number” of highly skilled immigrants to enter the U.S. and also involve mass deportations, and the number increased to 38.2 percent. Then add Option Five, which would allow only highly skilled immigrants while physically blocking the border, and the number increased to 55.2 percent. “Many citizens support policies that seem to fall outside of the range of policy options considered in elite discourse,” Broockman and Ahler conclude.

Shocking! We have said all along that the anti-White revolution is a top-down phenomenon initiated and maintained by hostile elites with very little popular support, especially among White people — which is why these elites continue to import millions of non-Whites. Those percentages show that an immigration platform something like Trump’s is a winner.

Trump’s immigration stance appears to fall somewhere between Option Five and Option Six, perhaps a little closer to the latter. It’s probably fair to say that, if Broockman and Ahler are correct, a majority of Americans — not just Republican voters, but all Americans — hold views that are consistent with Trump’s position, or are even more restrictive. Opponents like Graham portray Trump’s immigration position as far out of the mainstream, but that doesn’t appear to be the case.

Just a couple comments on Trump’s position paper which should be read in its entirety. It may be considered the Jeff Sessions playbook on immigration, including ending birthright citizenship. The only other presidential candidate mentioned is Marco Rubio:

When politicians talk about “immigration reform” they mean: amnesty, cheap labor and open borders. The Schumer-Rubio immigration bill was nothing more than a giveaway to the corporate patrons who run both parties. … Mark Zuckerberg’s personal Senator, Marco Rubio, has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities.

Beautiful. And he could have mentioned Rubio’s ultra-Zionist backers, Norman Braman, Larry Ellison, and Sheldon Adelson. Sounds like a pattern. Obviously, one of the big strengths of the Trump candidacy is that he is not dependent on the donor class. He gets another dig in at the donors:

Real immigration reform puts the needs of working people first – not wealthy globetrotting donors. We are the only country in the world whose immigration system puts the needs of other nations ahead of our own.

Unfortunately, all European-derived countries have immigration policies that are absolutely opposed to the interests of their native populations. We can now expect that a raging conflagration of media attacks against Trump and that Republican elites will continue to do all they can to derail Trump’s candidacy. This will be political theater at its best.

The American Freedom Party has been clamoring for “Putting Americans First”!

American Freedom Party Banner

Political Power for European Americans!

European people should organize and advance their own interests just like every other group. Join our fight for Heritage and Identity!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to [email protected] or click here:


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support American Freedom Party growth and our heritage of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party! Political Power for European-Americans!


European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!




American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party

The post Donald Trump’s Breakthrough Statement on Immigration appeared first on American Freedom Party.

Breitbart | Illegal aliens who show up at the border have been resettled all across United States of America instead of being detained and deported, as Donald Trump recently called for in his new immigration plan.

According to data from the Justice Department obtained by Breitbart News, 96 percent of Central Americans caught illegally crossing into the country last summer are still in the United States. Now Breitbart News has learned exclusively that a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from a pro-security group about the cost of this operation is being stonewalled.

Illegal DumpingIn January of 2015, the Immigration Reform Law Institute, on behalf of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), filed a FOIA request to discover the cost of accommodating the tens of thousands of illegal unaccompanied minors who came across the border encouraged by President Obama’s 2012 executive amnesty for illegal youths.

The FOIA letter made five requests of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency: that the federal agency detail (1) the costs of building of family detention centers; (2) the costs of apprehending, processing and detaining unaccompanied minors; (3) the costs transporting, transferring, removing and repatriating unaccompanied minors; (4) the costs related to ICE’s representation of government in removal procedures involving unaccompanied minors; and (5) the number of instances where objections to the return of unaccompanied minors were raised by the governments of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

Put Americans First… -American Freedom Party

The federal agency, however, refused to answer many of these questions– instead only partially answering two of the five requests. The agency provided only the costs of transporting, transferring and removing illegal minors, as well as the costs of the man-hours such tasks required. Those costs totaled $58.2 million—quadrupling ICE’s costs of $15.6 million in the year previous.

FAIR told Breitbart News that the agency did not provide clear documentation nor explanation as to how it arrived at this estimation.

FAIR asserts that, “The failure to provide most of the cost information related to the surge of [unaccompanied minors] indicates that the government has either failed to properly document those costs, or is refusing to reveal them.”

Because this FOIA request only inquired into the fiscal impact on the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency– it does not at all take into account the cost incurred by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) nor the public education system. Because most of the unaccompanied minors were turned over to HHS following their apprehension, FAIR notes that HHS’ costs “for providing shelter, food, education, health care and other services, likely vastly exceed additional costs incurred by ICE.”

The flood of minors has also placed fiscal strains on our public education system. FAIR notes that, “68,541 [unaccompanied minors] were apprehended entering the U.S. Virtually all of them have been allowed to remain in the U.S., at least temporarily.”

Because federal law dictates that all children are entitled to an education regardless of their immigration status, the fiscal burden of educating these students has fallen onto our public education system.

As FAIR notes, educating 68,541 illegal immigrant children at “an average annual cost of $12,401 per child enrolled in K-12 education, the annual cost to local schools is at least $850 million. However, since virtually all of the [unaccompanied minors] are non-English proficient, the actual costs are likely substantially greater.”

The increased costs and difficulties associated with educating illegal minors from poor and developing countries has been well-documented. As Fox News Latino reported in June of this year, the border surge has left many “schools struggling with influx of unaccompanied minors.” While the federal government’s policy of releasing illegal minors into American communities imposes burdens all across our nation’s education system, it will perhaps hurt minority American students most profoundly, by straining the educational resources needed in their communities.

For instance, New York’s Hempstead School District, which is a 96 percent black and Hispanic district, had about 6,700 students dispersed amongst its 10 schools and usually receives an average of a couple hundred new students every year. “However, last summer’s enrollment skyrocketed to about 1,500 new kids – most of them undocumented immigrants.” Fox News Latino writes, “The crush of new enrollees left the district scrambling, forcing it to dip into its emergency reserves to shell out more than $6 million to hire more English as a Second Language teachers and additional staff to alleviate overcrowded classrooms. Still, it has not been enough. The average classroom in the district now has about 40 to 50 children and [as one teacher explained is] posing a safety issue… ‘You have to understand,’ [one teacher said], ‘many of the children are not even proficient in their native language, Spanish, and now we have to teach them how to speak English. That can be very difficult.’”

Deporting instead of resettling illegal immigrants would save taxpayer dollars in two ways.

First, by deterring future border crossings, it would reduce the amount of illegal immigration in the future. As FAIR explains, refusing to implement immigration law has only encouraged more illegal immigrants to unlawfully enter the United States: “In July 2015, the Government Accountability Office confirmed that President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals [DACA] program played a substantial role in triggering the surge of [unaccompanied minors] in 2014.”

Second, deporting rather than resettling illegal immigrants would save the costs of feeding, clothing, housing, educating, hospitalizing, and caring for illegal immigrants and their relatives. A previous study conducted by FAIR documented that illegal immigrants cost U.S. taxpayers about $113 billion every year. After FAIR explains that by comparison, “The estimated cost of deporting an illegal alien is $8,318. Using just the partial enumerated $58.2 million costs to ICE and the conservative $850 million estimate for education of [unaccompanied minors] resettled in the U.S., the amount of taxpayer money spent on dealing with unaccompanied minors would have paid for the removal of an additional 109,000 illegal aliens.”

[Source: Breitbart.com]

Political Power for European Americans!

European people should organize and advance their own interests just like every other group. Join our fight for Heritage and Identity!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to [email protected] or click here:


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support American Freedom Party growth and our heritage of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party! Political Power for European-Americans!


European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!




American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party

The post Feds Hide Fiscal Details About Vast Operation To Resettle Illegal Alien Minors appeared first on American Freedom Party.

One-hundred years after his murder, elected officials, community members and a relative he didn’t live long enough to meet gathered at Old Mount Carmel Cemetery in Glendale to commemorate the life of Leo Frank, a Jewish man and Brooklyn son lynched in the South.

While serving a life sentence for murder, Frank was kidnapped from his Atlanta prison by a mob and lynched on August 17, 1915.

His killing, and what is by many considered his wrongful conviction, has widely been attributed to anti-Semitism, and served as a rallying call for the Jewish community, leading in part to the creation of the Anti-Defamation League, established a year after his trial. He lost several appeals of his conviction. An appeal to the Supreme Court also affirmed Frank’s guilt.

While elected officials at the ceremony acknowledged the strides that had been made since Frank’s murder, they stressed how much more needed to be done towards promoting tolerance, especially in the wake of a slew of hate crimes that have gripped the city in recent months.

Hate crimes are up 9 percent this year over last, with anti-Semitic hate crimes specifically up 29 percent.

“Hate and bigotry ultimately took Leo Frank’s life, and this still happens today, 100 years later,” said Councilwoman Elizabeth Crowley. “Whether it’s the color of your skin or the religion you practice, here in New York, across America, and all around the world, people are still killed for who they believe in or who they are.

“We’re here to remember a good man, and remember that we need to educate more, and need to fight these injustices to make this world a better place,” she added.

Catherine Smithline, Grandniece of Leo Frank

One of countless lynchings that gripped the deep South in the decades after the Civil War, Councilman Rory Lancman said it was important to utilize Frank’s story to reflect on intolerance against all people.

“Frank wasn’t the only American lynched in Georgia in 1950, we can be sure of that,” he said. “He is fortunate that he has a gravestone. Most didn’t even get that. So when we remember Frank, we must have in our minds every single victim of anti-Semitic, racist, homophobic, sexist injustice.”

Public Advocate Letitia James said it was important never to forget America’s bloody past, no matter how painful.

“Lynching unfortunately is a tragic part of our American history, but we nevertheless must tell the story of Leo Frank,” she said. “It’s important we keep Leo’s story alive, because despite the progress we’ve made, me know anti-Semitism and bigotry are alive and well today.”

Leo Frank family plot

Born in Texas but raised primarily in Brooklyn, Frank moved to Atlanta in 1907 to take a position as superintendent of the National Pencil Company. In April of 1912, a young female worker in the factory was found raped and murdered, and the following year a jury convicted Frank of the murder, primarily based on the testimony of a night janitor who researchers now widely believe to have been the actual murderer.

Many historians say that Frank’s faith, and his status as a Northerner, was largely the reason for his conviction.

Initially sentenced to death, his sentence was later commuted to life in prison in May 1915, but two months later a mob overtook his Atlanta prison, kidnapping and lynching him that night in Marietta, Georgia.

Leo Frank Program

Leo Frank Memorial Exterior Program

Catherine Smithline, Leo Frank’s grandniece, said his death was still a source of pain for her family, however she hoped his enduring memory would serve to further tolerance of all people.

“The story of Leo Frank will be remembered in the history books,” she said. “It amazes me how many times I’ve been contacted over the years. It was a deeply tragic event for my family and the country, but my consolation is that Leo Frank’s memory continues to serve as a catalyst for tolerance and understanding.”

Political Power for European Americans!

European people should organize and advance their own interests just like every other group. Join our fight for Heritage and Identity!

The American Freedom Party needs your help! Send $10, $20, $50, $100, or any contribution you can via PayPal “Send Money” to [email protected] or click here:


The American Freedom Party (AFP) supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the dinosaur Democrat and Republican parties. Join a National Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party!


Support American Freedom Party growth and our heritage of Western civilization! The American Freedom Party is the only party that addresses issues concerning European-American communities and all Americans.


Nationalism! Not Globalism! — America First! Not America Last!
Freedom from Republicans. Freedom from Democrats. American Freedom Party! Political Power for European-Americans!


European-Americans should push back! European-Americans should abandon the Republicans and Democrats. Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First!




American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party
American Freedom Party

The post Politicians Commemorate Centennial of Leo Frank’s Death appeared first on American Freedom Party.